Search This Blog

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Voetstoots clause alive and well

Cars line up for the first Ballito Street Heroes for some hard racing.
A private buyer can race it, brake it and still sell it voetstoots.
AN Edendale man who bought a Jetta from a private yard in the area asked Witness Wheels what legal recourse he had after the car stopped running on the second day after the sale.
He eventually towed the car back to the man who had sold it to him, who then took nine months to give him his money back, only last week returning two thirds of the money he was paid.
The seller told Witness Wheels he had deducted about R14 000 for the repairs that were necessary after the buyer had damaged the vehicle.
The buyer is livid, saying he did not drive the vehicle 20 km before “everything stopped”, and that the vehicle had stood in his yard while he tried to get it running again. He had then towed the car back to the seller and demanded the full amount he had paid for the dud car.
“How can the law help?” he asked.
The first thing we checked was whether the seller was a dealer or not.
The Consumer Protection Act (CPA) bans people who ordinarily offer to supply goods from using the voetstoots clause, but not —  note — private sellers. The voetstoots clause basically allows private sellers to flog a car that has to be “pushed by the feet”, which is what voetstoots means in Afrikaans.
As the seller of the Jetta has a yard full of cars, it could be argued that he ordinarily supplies cars and is therefore bound by the CPA’s regulations.
This would have included giving the buyer a full list of the Jetta’s faults and allowing a six months return period.
Witness Wheels probed some more and it emerged that the buyer had, after pushing the car back to his house, tried to get the Jetta running again by having a back-yard mechanic fix the gearbox.
That repair job nullified any slight claim the buyer may have had over the seller. The buyer must, therefore, try to make peace with the little money that was returned to him.
As the CPA stands, the seller could have argued at length in court that he is actually a private seller who is still protected by the voetstoots clause as set out in the CPA, and that he did not have to take back or refund the buyer for goods that were damaged.